Star (classification)

often reductive but still a useful enough heuristic

not very fulfilling on its own. If there were 3, or 4 of them it would be more enjoyable. 5 would be incredible but you can’t ask for everything.

too limited

i just want it to match the picture honestly

Meta, huh?

I think there are some cases where the 1-100 scale can be used but otherwise this is a clean, concise way to rate imo

if youre on this website you should be giving stars 5 stars

much better than rating out of 10 or 100 but still imperfect as it can’t be standardized in any meaningful way

well it's star

not the greatest but i do prefer it to just straight numbers most of the time #sorrystars

doesn't always tell the full story but convenient for statistics

Great activity

Anyone who uses this is a tool

overly reductive construct

How does it feel

YAYYYYY!!!!! :)

I have been hooked on pushing these buttons before Letterboxd was even a thing :(

Its been said before but it does just feel very reductive. Moreso when theres only 5, I think 10 is the perfect amount

highly flawed but admittedly easy to use and understand. surely theres a better alternative?

𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿 (𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻)

What else can be said?

𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫 (𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧) Rating system using star graphemes

Overrated