heav

just dress up warm? it's not that hard.

servicable.

i'm still waiting on a terrible conjunction.

this is an excellent word. it's an okay phenomenon. eclipses and occultations are mostly this, so that's neat.

it's a nice concept but a terrible travel destination.

i want to live here.

best.

it's pretty good. it can get a little stale once you've undergone most content and can play the game well reliably.

i love to hate loving it.

it's not that interesting to look at in this phase honestly. that said, being its brightest, and being up all night, it does have its own interesting properties.

i hear it calling.

it's fine.

it's a really good substance. obviously its importance to life is cool but i like more how it has these really convenient melting and boiling points, and forms fun crystals. it's also a very nice solvent.

this is one of the best things.

its origin is kind of weirdly defined.

four stars from me.

fish sauce. goes incredibly well with sulfur as seasoning.

i'd like to fill my lungs with it.

this is what i'm going to build my house out of.

i greatly enjoy its versatility, especially with the likes of QL and sulfur.

w. d. gaster.

i'm so green.

good.

loathe.

i like shadows.

i haven't ever seen one of these around the sun but they're around the moon all the time. it looks really intimidating when it's a little high up and you have an unobstructed view of it.

partial lunar eclipses are so colourful.

this is one of the coolest things about having a moon.

excellent name.

i wish i could give 0 stars.

i really like this.

i don't like it.

it's okay, i guess.

i mean, obviously.

thus i decay and rot.

rated 3 stars not because i think it's mediocre but because it's really funny. this joins the plough/big dipper and pleiades as one of the few asterisms probably known by people.

coathanger. love this. i can resolve this as a dim haze naked eye and as the coathanger with a bit of magnification on top of that.

i really love the needlessly expensive ticon smeltry image on this page.

really fun double star to look at with the eye.

that existing depends on this makes my life hell.

dim but large; one of my favourite naked eye visible star clusters next to the hyades.

it's a bit confusable with its surroundings but it has some prominent globular clusters in easily findable locations. it's very fun to see clearly when it's high up.

you can go look at this if you get bored of M13.

the Triangle. (the wikipedia image does not really do its surrounding context justice.)

i like this one for its position and naked eye visibility. i think there's some injustice in it only having a NGC designation. messier, is this not also a non-comet?

a six star system. pollux and castor are of course an iconic duo. despite the presence of 6 stars, sadly i can only rate at most 5 stars.

it's okay as a star. its position is very important of course. i want justice for the southern hemisphere though; they don't have a good pole star.

a very nicely positioned bright star. i like the triangle next to it.

huge constellation "L". it has the coathanger which i honestly feel like sagitta should have instead.

iconic, glorious.

i'm almost tempted to say 'overrated' but honestly it's just rated. very cool nebula; the most readily visible of its kind to me. maybe i'd prefer M8 if only i could see it.

excellent. sadly these aren't CGVs or i'd make some joke about 5 stars.

everything is these. that's the problem, though.

honestly love that this is possible.

it gets points for having a cool name and being part of a cool triangle.

i don't like it.

the only star i could readily visibly call 'blue', probably. (i'm not very good at seeing blue stars as such.)

great name and one of the more distinctly visibly colourful ones.

terrifying.

neat cluster with some neat surrounding stars. it's also bright enough for peoples' phone cameras to pick up sometimes, and is easy to find from surrounding stars, so it's fun to point out in pictures.

i only love you for your vague proximity to M35.

my review will increase when its magnitude does.

my review for this goes down to 2 stars every 3 days. (not really.)

tricky one. apparently some people can see this with their eyes. not me. it kind of reminds me of M31 but it's much dimmer.

it sure is there, i guess. at least it has a bigger angular size than M32.

not a lot going for it on its own but it is neat to point out to people that the slightly fuzzy star they see by M31 is actually an entire galaxy.

my thoughts on this are not overly distinct from that of M81. it's a little trickier to see under worse conditions or with binoculars, but my rating is the same.

this and M82 are iconic. it's nice to see two galaxies in roughly the same area.

takes up a shockingly large area of the night sky for something so far away. i like how unfathomable it is (moreso a property of galaxies in general, but still). and it's even coming over here and everything. also its satellite galaxies are neat i guess.

decent planetary nebula. iconic and gets very high up at mid-northern latitudes.

a real let-down.

very cool object for the northern hemisphere. visible to the eye in good enough conditions. the other two stars it's near make a fun shape with it.

dolphin🐬. excellent constellation. i think it deserves M15.

incensed.

a little tricky for me to see so far north but the horizon proximity makes it flicker a lot which is very neat. it gets 5 stars for being the brightest.

our closest star (system), and it even has exoplanets. i'm not in the southern hemisphere and can't see this star but it's cool in principle.

i like the tidal locking with charon. interesting looking surface and also a kuiper belt icon.

the resonance is really neat and io is very fast. you can see these even just with binoculars.

it's whatever. at least ceres is there.

i mean, it's better than being a rogue planet?

much dimmer than uranus and kind of redundant but it still has its interesting notes, what with triton and its kuiper belt interactions.

ice giant. it's okay. it's a bit dim.

would otherwise be a worse jupiter but the ring system is very iconic.

very cool planet. extremely massive, exciting visible storms, very aesthetic, interesting moon system, both very bright and outside of our orbit. i think we should have 10 more of them.

iconic, overlooked, deserves to be with the other ones honestly. also a very nontrivial fraction of the mass of the entire asteroid belt.

nice job finding some rocks on the beach, mars.

it has some things going on but it's a bit small. "overhyped" in my opinion.

the brightness is irritating sometimes but it's a lot cooler than if we didn't have one. i think we deserve more.

really cool planet. lots of interesting surface features and the weather's neat.

very bright, excellent inner planet. much cooler than mercury. my main complaint is maybe that the visible surface is rather featureless.

mildly interesting in that it's pretty close to the sun, otherwise mediocre. honestly this deserves to be a moon of something or another.