Lorecflag and name both suck, better design sense needed. and also a better sense of what the sexuality is supposed to encompass. if a presentation virtually does not exist in nature and is achieved only through artificial body modifications, at what point does it stop being a 'human gender' and start being furryism? for example, to cast no judgment on whether the person making the modification is trying to "pass as" anything, would a person attracted especially to genetic females who'd had leg-lengthening surgery and injections to change fat distribution but not top surgery, T, SRS, or FMS be considered "pansexual" or pansexual *plus* [some term representing attraction to body types that are not naturally-occurring in the human species, such as angels [biblically accurate or otherwise], furries, people with blue skin, etc.], since this is not part of the normal sex spectrum? what about attraction specifically to split tongues, is that considered part of normal pansexuality? it's really not clear. i suspect the people who originated this term were actually a- or demisexual and didn't understand that sexual attraction is supposed to be a specific feeling that's triggered by specific body or personality phenotypes.
No comments yet
Sign in to comment.